Liabilities / Assets
27th percentile
Higher debt load relative to assets than 27% of similar nonprofits.
Precomputed percentiles for this filing year versus similar nonprofits in the same peer cohort.
Liabilities / Assets
27th percentile
Higher debt load relative to assets than 27% of similar nonprofits.
Liabilities / Revenue
39th percentile
Higher debt load relative to revenue than 39% of similar nonprofits.
Net Margin
11th percentile
Higher net margin than 11% of similar nonprofits.
Top Officer Pay
Score unavailable
This filing does not contain officer compensation rows.
Asset Growth
37th percentile
Faster asset growth than 37% of similar nonprofits.
Revenue Growth
8th percentile
Faster revenue growth than 8% of similar nonprofits.
Assets
Up$2,884,978
Up $18,115 (+0.6%) from 2013
Net Assets
Down$2,742,611
Down $7,532 (-0.3%) from 2013
Liabilities
Up$142,367
Up $25,647 (+22%) from 2013
Revenue
Down$1,252,988
Down $204,773 (-14%) from 2013
Expenses
Down$1,370,677
Down $27,807 (-2.0%) from 2013
Net Income
Down-$117,689
Down $176,966 (-299%) from 2013
This 2014 filing currently has summary financial data only. Detailed schedules, leadership, and program rows are not available for this filing yet.
Improvement of the business conditions of agriculture and trade in the mississippi delta communities and in industrial development in the mississippi delta
No mirrored PDF or thumbnail assets are attached yet.
Displayed year
2014 • Form 990Summary only. Only limited summary data is available for this year.
Similar nonprofits based on the same Siviq industry and scale cohort. 2014 filings • 501(c)6 • $1M-$5M nonprofits
Gaithersburg, MD
View Organization501(c)6
Revenue vs current organization
19% higherAssets vs current organization
About the sameRochester, NY
View Organization501(c)6
Revenue vs current organization
8.5% higherAssets vs current organization
About the sameProvidence, RI
View Organization501(c)6
Revenue vs current organization
100% higherAssets vs current organization
16% lowerChicago, IL
View Organization501(c)6
Revenue vs current organization
87% higherAssets vs current organization
5.3% lower