Liabilities / Assets
54th percentile
Tied with the lowest-debt nonprofits in its peer group.
Precomputed percentiles for this filing year versus similar nonprofits in the same peer cohort.
Liabilities / Assets
54th percentile
Tied with the lowest-debt nonprofits in its peer group.
Liabilities / Revenue
54th percentile
Tied with the lowest-debt nonprofits in its peer group.
Net Margin
69th percentile
Higher net margin than 69% of similar nonprofits.
Top Officer Pay
Score unavailable
This filing does not contain officer compensation rows.
Asset Growth
62nd percentile
Faster asset growth than 62% of similar nonprofits.
Revenue Growth
30th percentile
Faster revenue growth than 30% of similar nonprofits.
Assets
Up$228,550
Up $20,214 (+9.7%) from 2014
Net Assets
Up$228,550
Up $23,028 (+11%) from 2014
Liabilities
Down$0
Down $2,814 (-100%) from 2014
Revenue
Down$169,841
Down $25,958 (-13%) from 2014
Expenses
Down$146,813
Down $20,959 (-12%) from 2014
Net Income
Down$23,028
Down $4,999 (-18%) from 2014
This 2015 filing currently has summary financial data only. Detailed schedules, leadership, and program rows are not available for this filing yet.
Women partnering is a network of women from diverse backgrounds who respond to the unmet needs of financially vulnerable women and children in the colorado springs area. See schedule o for continuation.
No mirrored PDF or thumbnail assets are attached yet.
Displayed year
2015 • Form 990Summary only. Only limited summary data is available for this year.
Similar nonprofits based on the same Siviq industry and scale cohort. 2015 filings • 501(c)3 • <$500k nonprofits
Burbank, CA
View Organization501(c)3
Revenue vs current organization
90% lowerAssets vs current organization
About the sameLocation unavailable
View Organization501(c)3
Revenue vs current organization
35% higherAssets vs current organization
99% lowerFerdinand, IN
View Organization501(c)3
Revenue vs current organization
71% lowerAssets vs current organization
About the sameBirmingham, AL
View Organization501(c)3
Revenue vs current organization
35% higherAssets vs current organization
69% lower