Liabilities / Assets
43rd percentile
Higher debt load relative to assets than 43% of similar nonprofits.
990 • Fiscal year 2015 • EIN 84-1411225
Precomputed percentiles for this filing year versus similar nonprofits in the same peer cohort.
Liabilities / Assets
43rd percentile
Higher debt load relative to assets than 43% of similar nonprofits.
Liabilities / Revenue
48th percentile
Higher debt load relative to revenue than 48% of similar nonprofits.
Net Margin
14th percentile
Higher net margin than 14% of similar nonprofits.
Top Officer Pay
Score unavailable
This filing does not contain officer compensation rows.
Asset Growth
9th percentile
Faster asset growth than 9% of similar nonprofits.
Revenue Growth
17th percentile
Faster revenue growth than 17% of similar nonprofits.
Assets
Down$1,714,924
Down $265,064 (-13%) from 2014
Net Assets
Down$1,606,999
Down $229,439 (-12%) from 2014
Liabilities
Down$107,925
Down $35,625 (-25%) from 2014
Revenue
Down$1,093,804
Down $215,207 (-16%) from 2014
Expenses
Down$1,323,243
Down $115,486 (-8.0%) from 2014
Net Income
Down-$229,439
Down $99,721 (-77%) from 2014
This 2015 filing currently has summary financial data only. Detailed schedules, leadership, and program rows are not available for this filing yet.
Teach individuals and families how to manage their finances wisely to improve and sustain financial well-being
No mirrored PDF or thumbnail assets are attached yet.
Displayed year
2015 • Form 990Summary only. Only limited summary data is available for this year.
Similar nonprofits based on the same Siviq industry and scale cohort. 2015 filings • 501(c)3 • $1M-$5M nonprofits
Matteson, IL
View Organization501(c)3
Revenue vs current organization
56% higherAssets vs current organization
100% lowerNew York, NY
View Organization501(c)3
Revenue vs current organization
94% lowerAssets vs current organization
About the sameWashington, PA
View Organization501(c)3
Revenue vs current organization
57% higherAssets vs current organization
100% lowerConshohocken, PA
View Organization501(c)3
Revenue vs current organization
56% higherAssets vs current organization
100% lower