Rappahannock Westminster Canterbury Inc.

“Emily may, the marketing/foundation coordinator for rappahannock westminster-canterbury, inc. And rappahannock westminster-canterbury foundation, is the wife of david may, board chairman.”

“The form 990 is presented to the finance committee for review. The form 990 is then presented to the board of directors as part of the finance committee presentation before it is filed with the irs. A copy of the 990 is also provided to all board members before filing.”

“We have an active corporate compliance program and officer. The program contains a detailed protocol to address/investigate/take action for suspected and/or actual conflicts of interest. Further, trustees are required to complete on an annual basis the conflict of interest statement. In addition, the organization's personnel policies, applicable to all personnel, contain a section regarding conflict of interest. The protocol both in the personnel policies and the corporate compliance program outline a process for review and action. Substantiated conflicts of interest will result in discipline up to and including termination for employees and sanctions up to and including removal for trustees.”

“Ceo evaluation the ceo's performance and compensation is reviewed annually by the board of trustees and on a periodic basis, if appropriate, as determined by the board chairman. The annual review addresses compensation and performance. The process for determining compensation is: -compensation data for comparable virginia executives is obtained and used as a benchmark. -internal compression issues and accomplishments are taken into consideration. -budget and budget constraints are taken into consideration. -a wage increase and or incentive are determined by the board of trustees. The process for judging performance is: -the board chair obtains input and feedback from individual trustees using a questionnaire or by obtaining direct feedback covering subjects such as accomplishment of goals and objectives, strengths, items of concern, and other relevant matters pertaining to ceo performance. -this information is reviewed and summarized by the board chair, reviewed and discussed with the board in an executive session, and reviewed and discussed with the ceo also in an executive session of the board. -throughout the year, the board chair shares feedback received by the individual trustees and or the community with the ceo. Ceo last review date the ceo's performance and compensation is reviewed on a fiscal year basis. Rw-c's fiscal year is april 1 through march 31. Officer evaluation officers' performance and compensation is reviewed annually by the ceo and on a periodic basis, if appropriate, as determined by the ceo. The annual review addresses compensation and performance. The process for determining compensation is: -compensation data for comparable virginia executives is obtained and used as a benchmark. -internal compression issues and accomplishments are taken into consideration. -budget and budget constraints are taken into consideration. -a wage increase and or incentive are determined by the ceo. The process for judging performance is: -the ceo conducts a formal performance review using the organization's performance review form and by providing supporting commentary covering subjects such as accomplishment of goals and objectives, strengths, items of concern, and other relevant matters pertaining to officer performance. -this information is reviewed and discussed with the officer in a private setting. The officer is also afforded the opportunity to provide any verbal and or written comments he or she feels is appropriate to their formal performance review. -throughout the year, the ceo shares feedback received by the individual trustees, the community, and staff with the officer. Recent year's performance review the ceo's performance and compensation is reviewed on a fiscal year basis. The executive committee of the board of trustees met august 12, 2019 to assess the performance of stuart bunting and to review the compensation package for his position. The committee as part of the compensation review evaluated the package against comparable industry and local employers. The executive committee reported the performance review and the compensation assessment to the board of trustees on august 16, 2019.”

“The organization's conflict of interest policy and financial statements are available upon request.”

“Officers listed on part vii work an average of 40 hours per week. Their time is shared between the filing organization and the related entity listed on schedule r.”

“Assets released from restrictions -320,066. Increase in beneficial interest of foundation 464,413. Net assets transferred 90,000.”

“The organization has a committee that assumes responsibility for oversight of the audit of its financial statements and selection of an independent accountant. The organization has not changed its oversight process or selection process during the tax year.”