Liabilities / Assets
55th percentile
Higher debt load relative to assets than 55% of similar nonprofits.
Precomputed percentiles for this filing year versus similar nonprofits in the same peer cohort.
Liabilities / Assets
55th percentile
Higher debt load relative to assets than 55% of similar nonprofits.
Liabilities / Revenue
57th percentile
Higher debt load relative to revenue than 57% of similar nonprofits.
Net Margin
73rd percentile
Higher net margin than 73% of similar nonprofits.
Top Officer Pay
Score unavailable
This filing does not contain officer compensation rows.
Asset Growth
57th percentile
Faster asset growth than 57% of similar nonprofits.
Revenue Growth
82nd percentile
Faster revenue growth than 82% of similar nonprofits.
Assets
Up$329,627
Up $17,153 (+5.5%) from 2012
Net Assets
Up$329,577
Up $17,443 (+5.6%) from 2012
Liabilities
Down$50
Down $290 (-85%) from 2012
Revenue
Up$104,648
Up $29,798 (+40%) from 2012
Expenses
Up$87,204
Up $59,065 (+210%) from 2012
Net Income
Down$17,444
Down $29,267 (-63%) from 2012
This 2013 filing currently has summary financial data only. Detailed schedules, leadership, and program rows are not available for this filing yet.
The mission of the York County Human Services Fund is to mobilize the caring power of donors to support the building blocks of better lives and a stronger community
No mirrored PDF or thumbnail assets are attached yet.
Displayed year
2013 • Form 990Summary only. Only limited summary data is available for this year.
Similar nonprofits based on the same Siviq industry and scale cohort. 2013 filings • 501(c)3 • <$500k nonprofits
Location unavailable
View Organization501(c)3
Revenue vs current organization
215% higherAssets vs current organization
100% lowerHuntingtn Bch, CA
View Organization501(c)3
Revenue vs current organization
216% higherAssets vs current organization
99% lowerMonroe, LA
View Organization501(c)3
Revenue vs current organization
100% lowerAssets vs current organization
About the sameLocation unavailable
View Organization501(c)3
Revenue vs current organization
216% higherAssets vs current organization
97% lower