Unjournal Inc

“Our three voting members meticulously review each form to guarantee precision and uniformity. This careful scrutiny ensures that all information provided is accurate and consistent meeting the highest standards of quality and compliance.”

“The nonprofit organization rigorously enforces its Conflict of Interest Policy COI under the oversight of the three voting board members. This commitment guarantees transparency accountability and ethical governance throughout all operations. By upholding this policy the organization maintains integrity and trust among stakeholders fostering a culture of responsible decision-making and stewardship of resources.”

“| Name of the Person:, The process used to establish compensation of the person who served in:|, The year in which this process was last undertaken:| David Reinstein, Our organization conducts wage comparisons to evaluate how employee salaries align with market averages. This analysis helps ensure fair compensation aiding staff retention and organizational performance. By benchmarking against industry standards we strive to maintain competitive wages that attract and retain top talent fostering a productive and motivated workforce., 2024| Davit Jintcharadze, Our organization conducts thorough wage comparisons to assess the alignment of employee salaries with market averages ensuring equitable compensation levels that support staff retention and enhance organizational performance. Through benchmarking against industry standards we aim to sustain competitive wages that attract and retain top talent ultimately cultivating a dynamic and motivated workforce committed to excellence. This essential service contributes to creating a positive workplace environment and driving overall success within the organization., 2024|”

“No documents available to the public”

“| Explanation:| Board members and employees of the organization must recuse themselves from any decision-making and information related to projects with which they have a conflict of interest are personally involved with.”

“| Explanation:| The compensation for the Director was determined by taking 80% of his previous compensation rate at a similar-level position at a similar organization Rethink Priorities. This was also checked against typical compensation rates at similar and related organizations falling roughly 20-50% below those levels. The compensation rates have been shared with our grantors in the applications and with members of the Unjournal management team including board directors and non-board directors who were given the opportunity to provide feedback. The compensation for all other contractors was determined by consulting average market rates.”

“| Explanation:| All forms are available upon request within 5 business days.”

“| Explanation:| Mr Jintcharadze is paid as an independent contractor for operations-management services performed entirely from the United Kingdom. The board applied the IRS common-law tests behavioral financial and relationship control and concluded that he meets the criteria for contractor status: he sets his own work hours furnishes his own equipment invoices monthly and bears the risk of profit or loss. Total 2024 compensation for these services was $52 713 well below the $100 000 reporting threshold for Part VII Section B. No compensation is paid for his volunteer role as a director; the contract terms were reviewed and approved by the disinterested directors with Mr Jintcharadze recused from the vote.”

“| Explanation:| The Unjournal works to increases the rigor and impact of quantitative social-science research by commissioning open structured peer reviews and publicly sharing and disseminating these”

“| Explanation:| The Unjournal commission experts to publicly evaluate and rate research. We aim to make impactful research more rigorous make academic work more useful support open science open access and transparency and improve peer-review helping align research incentives with truth-seeking and social value. We focus on research in economics policy and other quantitative social science with potential for global impact. The Unjournal publishes evaluation packages including evaluations ratings claim evaluation authors responses and syntheses on our PubPub page unjournal.pubpub.org and communicates and disseminates these across a range of formats.”

“| Explanation:| The Unjournals team considers publicly-hosted research submitted to us or found on working paper archives submitted or solicited online. Relevant field experts on our team consider these research objects and rate their suitability for further evaluation based on The Unjournals priorities focusing on potential for impact as well as evaluability and field-relevance t. We then enlist a relevant team paid $300-500 to manage an evaluation of the specific research. They source at least two experts in the field to provide a peer-review-like evaluation of the research in question. The evaluators are typically compensated by $100-$700. The Unjournal also provides financial incentives and prizes for strong evaluation work and continuous engagement with the evaluation and dissemination process.”

“| Explanation:| The organization filed FinCEN 114 for the U.K. account”

“| Explanation:| Research-evaluation-related expenses $26 415 compensation for evaluators and researchers managing the evaluation process; Consulting $2 914 technical and data.”