Spectrum Health Foundation

“Christina freese decker and matthew e. Cox have a business relationship as they serve as an officer or director of corewell health indemnity company, ltd, a related taxable entity. Christina freese decker and matthew e. Cox have a business relationship as they serve as an officer or director of priority health managed benefits, inc., a related taxable entity. Alejandro quiroga chand md and joshua kooistra do have a business relationship as they serve as an officer or director of spectrum health physician alliance, a related taxable entity. Christina freese decker and jason decker have a family relationship.”

“Corewell health, a michigan nonprofit corporation, is the ultimate sole member of corewell health foundation west michigan.”

“Corewell health, a michigan nonprofit corporation, is the ultimate sole member of corewell health foundation west michigan and has the right to elect one or more members of corewell health foundation west michigan's governing body.”

“Corewell health, a michigan nonprofit corporation, is the ultimate sole member of corewell health foundation west michigan and has certain reserved powers over operations of corewell health foundation west michigan, including but not limited to budget, acquisitions, capital projects, and participation in joint ventures.”

“The form 990 is prepared by corewell health corporate tax. It is reviewed by the corporate tax manager and the director of tax. A copy of the form 990 is then provided to each member of the governing body. All questions are addressed prior to filing the form 990.”

“1. Conflicts of interest must be disclosed, via an annual electronic disclosure process and verbally at each board and board committee meeting as part of the declaration of conflict of interest prior to discussion of any agenda items. 2. A person having a financial interest in a proposed transaction or arrangement may make a presentation at a meeting of the board or committee which is considering that transaction or arrangement, but after that presentation he/she shall leave the meeting before discussion and voting on that proposed transaction or arrangement. The person having the financial interest shall not be counted in determining whether a quorum is present. 3. The chairperson of the board or the committee chair shall, if appropriate, appoint a disinterested person or committee (including outside advisors) to investigate alternatives to the proposed transaction or arrangement, and to advise whether the proposed transaction or arrangement is in the organization's best interest. 4. The board or committee shall exercise due diligence to determine whether the organization can, with reasonable efforts, obtain a more advantageous transaction or arrangement that would not give rise to aconflict of interest. 5. If a more advantageous transaction or arrangement is not reasonably attainable under circumstances that would not give rise to a conflict of interest, the board or committee shall determine by a majority vote of the disinterested directors and members whether the proposed transaction or arrangement is in the organization's best interest and for its own benefit and whether the transaction is fair and reasonable to the organization, and shall make its decision as to whether to enter into the transaction or arrangement in conformity with such determination. 6. The minutes of the meetings of the board and all of the organization's committees shall set forth: a) the names of the persons who disclosed a financial interest in a proposed transaction or arrangement involving the organization or any of its subsidiaries and the nature of the financial interest; and b) the names of the persons who were present for discussions and votes relating to such transaction or arrangement, including any discussion of alternatives to the proposed transaction or arrangement, and a record of any votes taken in connection with that matter. The votes of individual members need not be recorded unless otherwise directed by the board ofdirectors or committee. 7. There is an ongoing requirement that members of the board and board committees update their annual disclosure questionnaire at any point during his/her tenure on the board of directors when a new potential conflict of interest arises. Management 1. Upon acceptance of an employment offer, each member of management (directors and above) completes a conflict-of-interest disclosure questionnaire. A copy of the member of management's disclosure questionnaire is sent to the organization's system compliance department. A copy of the member of management's disclosure is reviewed by the organization's compliance operations analyst and escalated to the appropriate executive leadership team, if necessary. 2. Annually, each member of management (directors and above) completes an annual conflict of interest disclosure questionnaire electronically. If there is an affirmative disclosure, the questionnaire is reviewed by the appropriate executive leadership team. 3. There is an ongoing requirement to update the disclosure questionnaire when a new potential conflict of interest arises. Updated disclosures follow the same process as initial disclosures described above. 4. The compliance officer, in consultation with executive management, determines how reported conflicts should be managed. Management of a conflict may take a variety of different forms from implementation of a management plan to requiring that the member of management cease the activity creating the conflict or, in extreme cases, leave the organi”

“The organization's articles of incorporation have been provided to the state of michigan and are available to the public on the state's website. The organization's bylaws and internal policies are generally not made available to the public.”

“SHARED SERVICES/MGMT FEES: Program service expenses 703,918. Management and general expenses 1,864,951. Fundraising expenses 3,120,734. Total expenses 5,689,603.”

“Transfers from affiliates 3,762,281. Pledge write offs -617,236. Net assets beginning of year reported on group filing 246,559,133.”

“No change in oversight from prior year.”